With the increase of an aging population and the rising cost of hospital-based care, advanced technologies are being developed to facilitate remote healthcare monitoring and treatment. Moving healthcare out of the hospital and into the home offers patients, healthcare providers and insurers both convenience and cost savings. A challenge arises, however, for regulatory authorities (and OEMs) in determining appropriate safety considerations for these technologies. Unlike hospitals, patient’s homes are uncontrolled environments. There are no trained equipment operators, and there is no guarantee of a proper electrical installation. Accordingly, additional measures must be taken to ensure medical electrical equipment remains safe for use in these uncontrolled environments. To standardize these additional measures, a group of clinicians, engineers, and regulators established the 60601-1-11 collateral requirements for medical electrical equipment and medical electrical systems used in the home healthcare environment.
Provisions of the standard impose several constraints on the selection of AC/DC power converters for home healthcare applications. As OEMs endeavour to bring equipment that was originally designed for use in a clinical environment to the home healthcare market, they often learn that a single AC/DC converter will not suffice for both environments. While there are some solutions that have been explicitly designed for home healthcare, many more power converters designed and certified to the 60601-1 general standard can still be used in home healthcare if appropriate considerations are made. It’s important to understand how requirements of the collateral standard impact the selection of an AC/DC power converter for home healthcare applications and what constraints to consider when using a 60601-1 general standard certified converter.
The 60601-1 general standard assumes that supply mains are expected to have a 10% tolerance from nominal. That is, if a device is to be rated for operation on supply mains ranging from 100Vac to 240Vac (Universal Line), the device must safely function per specification on input voltages ranging from 90Vac to 264Vac (100Vac-10%, to 240Vac+10%). In a controlled healthcare environment, a ±10% tolerance on the mains supply voltage is a reasonable assumption, but mains voltages in an uncontrolled home environment may be less predictable. For this reason, the 60601-1-11 collateral standard assumes that nominal mains voltages may exhibit a tolerance of +10%/-15%, corresponding to an operational input voltage range of 85Vac to 264Vac for universal line input devices.
The first and most obvious impact the lower-line operation requirement has on the power converter is the presence of greater primary-side currents. A converter’s input current can be modelled as a function of output power, efficiency, power factor, and line-voltage:
Where Pout is the output power in Watts, pf is the power factor, and η is the conversion efficiency. If one assumes that efficiency and power factor are both independent of line voltage (which is generally not true but simplifies this discussion without muddying the implications) then, for a given load, the input current is inversely proportional to the line voltage.
Accordingly, a 5.55% reduction in line voltage (90Vac down to 85Vac) results in roughly a 5.9% increase in line current. This proportionality will vary some as power factor and operational efficiency are both impacted by line voltage, but the key observation is that any current margin or thermal (I2R) margin designed into the primary side components has been significantly reduced if the converter was designed for a minimum line voltage of 90Vac.
Increased primary side currents are not the only concern. The anticipated input voltage range is one of the earliest design parameters for any conversion topology. Typically, the input voltage is directly related to the amount of energy per cycle that the converter is physically able to transfer to secondary. A reduction in input voltage (while made up by current hikes from a power perspective) can ultimately reduce the amount of energy that can be transferred per cycle. When the input voltage is reduced below the anticipated minimum, there is a risk of maxing out the switching frequency and/or duty cycle. In such a case, the converter will be rendered unable to sustain its rated load.
The solution to both problems for a 60601-1 general standard certified PSU (designed for 90Vac-264Vac operation) is output power derating. It is trivial to calculate the output power reduction required to offset the increases in primary side currents according to the aforementioned formula, but a bit more difficult to anticipate effects on the actual conversion process. Inquire with the PSU manufacturer regarding an appropriate low-line derating strategy.
All power converters must provide users with at least two means of protection from hazardous voltages. Class I power supplies protect users via a single layer of basic insulation and a protective Earth ground connection which keeps users safe by providing a low impedance path to zero potential for fault currents to follow. The PSU manufacturer’s ability to ensure that path has an appropriately low impedance stops at the PSU AC inlet. Earth ground connections in older homes around the world are notoriously unreliable (if existent) and can be easily bypassed by users. IEC 60601-1-11 does not allow OEMs to rely on in-home Earth ground connections for one of the two required protection mechanisms. Rather, the collateral standard requires power supplies be of construction Class II.
Class II power supplies utilize additional basic insulation or reinforced insulation to provide a second means of protection rather than Earth ground. With or without a reliable Earth ground connection in the home, these power supplies ensure users are properly protected from hazardous voltages.
Clause 6 of the collateral standard mandates that if the medical electrical equipment is equipped with applied parts, those applied parts must be type BF at minimum. While a BF ready power supply is not necessarily required to facilitate the use of type BF applied parts, it can make the process a good deal simpler and is typically preferred. It is important to recognize that power supplies themselves are not applied parts and therefore do not have an applied part type directly associated with them. However, the PSU can be selected to provide the required degree of isolation from ground and to properly mitigate leakage currents.
As was detailed in the last section, power supplies for home healthcare applications must be of Construction Class II, so the Earth ground isolation component of this characterization is moot. Patient auxiliary currents on the other hand must be constrained to 100µAac (500µAac under single fault conditions). Not all 60601-1 certified power supplies offer BF class outputs.
Per 60601-1-11, external power adaptors must be encased in a manner that provides at least IP21 rated ingress protection in accordance with IEC 60529, and must be labelled accordingly. An IP2x rating indicates (in part) that no object with a diameter greater than 12.5mm can penetrate the enclosure under a force of 30N or less.
This Level 2 solid ingress rating is intended to emulate a small human finger and ensures that objects of that size or larger cannot make their way into the enclosure. One would be hard pressed to find a power adaptor that was not inherently solid ingress Level 2 compliant. The same is not true for IPx1, Level 1 liquid ingress protection.
While the IEC 60529 test for IPx1, stipulating a drip rate of 1mm/min (like a light rainfall) is seemingly benign, over the 10 minute test duration one may be surprised to find that water dripping off the edges of a power supply enclosure can pool up at interfaces with cable strain reliefs, or along the edges of a removable AC blade attachment (interchangeable wall mount devices) and make its way into the electronics. This would constitute a failure and an inadequacy for use in a home healthcare application. Achieving IPx1 is not a difficult engineering problem to solve, and many off-the-shelf 60601-1 power supplies are inherently compliant, but one should be careful not to assume compliance.
Medical electrical equipment used in an uncontrolled home environment is more likely to be subjected to mechanical disturbances than equipment used in a clinical environment. Playing children or rogue pets may inadvertently knock a device from a table top. A weekend away from home may require transport of home healthcare equipment in the trunk of a car traveling over speed bumps and rumble strips. There is a clear need for the equipment to remain safe and functional in the face of augmented mechanical stress.
Basic safety and essential performance of a home healthcare power supply must be maintained after undergoing the following shock and broad-band random vibration tests:
Shock: Tested against IEC 60068-2-27:2008 with three half- sine pulses of 150m/s2 peak acceleration and 11ms duration through each axis.
Vibration: Tested against IEC 60068-2-64:2008 for 30 minutes per each perpendicular axis with the following acceleration amplitude:
10Hz to 100Hz: 1.0
200Hz to 200Hz: -3db per octave;
200Hz to 2,000Hz: 0.5;
This is another example of a 60601-1-11 item that may very well be inherent to several well-designed general standard certified PSUs, but inherent compliance should not be assumed.
Power supplies for use in home healthcare applications must be compliant with IEC 60601-1-2 Edition 4. In fact, as of December 31, 2018 all medical electrical equipment sold for use in Europe and/or North America must be compliant with this edition which has historically held significance for home healthcare applications due to the uncontrolled nature of the environment.
In addition to some nuanced deviations in emissions mandates over Edition 3, the fourth edition imposes some stringent immunity requirements including, but not limited to:
When bringing your medical device to the home healthcare market, IEC 60601-1-11 imposes an additional 13 clauses over the 60601-1 general standard. A number of these design challenges are directly associated with careful selection of an appropriate power converter. By selecting a partner that is well versed in the nuances of the IEC 60601-1-11 standard as they pertain to power system requirements, your team can tap into expertise that will guide you well in your home healthcare power supply selection.
Novel EM tracking developments mitigate distortion and enable surgical navigation in a wider range of use cases.
Business Development Engineer, Stephen Oxley discusses his top 10 tips when it comes to designing with High Voltage Resistors.